V.5 No 1

1

Supplement to the study of classical transverse Doppler effect in respond to received criticism

From: :shuba (tim.shuba@lycos.ScPoAmM)

Thread: :Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect

Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Date: 2005-04-13 15:34:20 PST

Sergey Karavashkin wrote:

> *Abstract*

>

> On the basis of complete solution of Doppler shift of frequency

> received by moving receiver, noting non-central motion of receiver as

> to the source, we compare the properties of longitudinal and

> transverse Doppler effect predicted by classical and relativistic

> formalism. We show that complete statement of problem predicts the

> transverse Doppler effect in frames of classical formalism, but its

> properties considerably differ from relativistic predictions. In

> particular, the sign of effect predicted by classical conception is

> opposite to that relativistic. While just the classical approach is

> most fully consistent with the phenomenology of effect, while the

> relativistic approach is essentially problematic both in description

> of phenomenon and in consistency of functional regularity with the

> properties of transverse Doppler effect. We show that the main

> difficulty being the underpinning of relativistic interpretation is

> Fitzgerald hypothesis on whose basis have been built both Lorentz

> theory and Einstein's conception of constant speed of light in all

> inertial reference frames.

Совершенное неправильно. Например, смотрите статью внизу.

http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-04/2-04.htm

---Tim Shuba---