т.5 No 1 |
С.Б. Каравашкин и О.Н. Каравашкина |
1 |
Дополнение к исследованию классического поперечного эффекта Допплера в связи с поступившей критикой |
||
От:shuba (tim.shuba@lycos.ScPoAmM) Тема:Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect Группы новостей:sci.physics.relativity Дата:2005-04-13 15:34:20 PST Sergey Karavashkin wrote: > *Abstract* > On the basis of complete solution of Doppler shift of frequency > received by moving receiver, noting non-central motion of receiver as > to the source, we compare the properties of longitudinal and > transverse Doppler effect predicted by classical and relativistic > formalism. We show that complete statement of problem predicts the > transverse Doppler effect in frames of classical formalism, but its > properties considerably differ from relativistic predictions. In > particular, the sign of effect predicted by classical conception is > opposite to that relativistic. While just the classical approach is > most fully consistent with the phenomenology of effect, while the > relativistic approach is essentially problematic both in description > of phenomenon and in consistency of functional regularity with the > properties of transverse Doppler effect. We show that the main > difficulty being the underpinning of relativistic interpretation is > Fitzgerald hypothesis on whose basis have been built both Lorentz > theory and Einstein's conception of constant speed of light in all > inertial reference frames. Совершенное неправильно. Например, смотрите статью внизу. http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-04/2-04.htm ---Tim Shuba--- |