SELF |
86 - 88 |
S.B. Karavashkin and O.N. Karavashkina | |
This derivation shows also the independence of the total differential of the way, how z is represented. And at = 0 |
|
at = /2 | |
If we now distract from the way how we compared the partial differentials dx, dy and superimpose the limits taken from the system (11) with (20), we yield |
|
i.e. the known value of total differential. This fully corroborates that we were right when identified dz as (20) with the total differential. Now let us determine the differential of w at the point w0 under condition that there 87 exists the one-valued map of the -vicinity of the complex plane z into the -vicinity of the complex plane w. As we showed above, in the most general form the function of complex variable can be written as |
|
The increment of the function at the point w0 will be |
|
|
(21) |
We see from (21) that w depends, just as z , on one variable . Thus, we may write |
|
and |
|
|
(22) |
If we use the yielded values of differentials of independent variable z and complex function w( z ), it will be not difficult to yield the expression for the total derivative of the complex function. For it, we can make use of (9), (20) and (22): |
|
(23) | |
88 | |
To find the form, how can we express the total derivative of complex variable of z presented in coordinate form, let us use (2). Then (23) will take the following appearance: |
|
|
(24) |
Contents: / 77 - 78 / 78 - 79 / 80 - 81 / 81 - 83 / 84 - 86 / 86 - 88 / 88 - 90 / 90 - 91 / 91 - 93 / 93 - 94 /