V.3 No 1 |
13 |
| Comparison of characteristics of propagation velocities | |
|
|
Of course, the described process has its features. In
particular, the transverse velocity of shift of the elements of medium does not induce the
shift of neighbouring elements, since it is the consequence of superimposing acoustic
fields, not the reason of excitation of transverse oscillations. We should also note that
to this transverse shift there will correspond the complex local longitudinal oscillations
connected with the pressure redistribution. None the less, as the experiment showed, from
this superposition there has resulted an independent transverse wave in gas which had all
properties characterising this type of waves. Namely, there has formed the polarisation
plane, near and far fields whose properties essentially differed. And should the formation
of transverse velocity had a pure interference pattern, in the far field at r
>> |
|
|
(16) |
| and | |
|
(17) |
In other words, the far field simply would not form, and the entire process would localise in the near field. However the experimental results of [15] evidence that the far field of the transverse acoustic wave has formed, in this field the wave polarisation remained, and the amplitude decreased with the distance in proportion to 1/r . This evidences that in the present case there exist some factors disregarded by the standard formalism, and they allow, in the absence of shear deformation in the medium, to form a transverse acoustic wave in the far field, with all salient features of this field - the constant velocity of wave propagation, stable polarisation plane and regularity of the amplitude decrease with the distance proportional to 1/r . Another feature of the obtained experimental data was the
observed fast increase of the delay phase with a large variation within the band in the
near field, which does not follow from the conventional theoretical models of the
radiation of elementary EM radiators. And this is basically important issue. In
particular, in [11] we showed the standard idea - that in the near field "there is no energy transfer; there is only a periodic energy exchange
between the electric and magnetic components of the field" [17, p. 99] -
grounding on the incorrect disregarding the delay phases at r << |
|
|
(18) |
(where The opposition of theoretical research in the
electromagnetism to the experimental results presented in [15] complicates by the fact
that, according to [15], the near region of acoustic field extends to r = 10 |
|