V.5 No 1

51

Classical transverse Doppler-effect

But if the time at the observer's has stopped, the sequence of exterior events will also disappear, not only the intensity of source signal will change, as Einstein predicted.

To understand what will follow from it, consider a simple model of observer's motion with the speed of light as to two stationary sources.

Suppose, two stationary sources of light are in some reference frame and the observer registering the radiation of both moves with the speed of light c as to them. Suppose, the observer moves centrally as to the source S₁ and so approaches this source, and as to the source S₂ he moves with some small aimed distance h₂.

The animation in Fig. 6 shows the result of such modelling from the view of stationary frame.

Fig. 6. Observer's motion with the speed of light c as to crossing stationary sources radiating signals of frequency = 100 Hz; the aimed distance of the observer's trajectory towards the second source S₂ is 800 km

We see from the diagram that during his motion, the observer periodically gets into the regions of presence of signals of both sources alternating with the regions of signals absence. The places at which the observer's trajectory crosses with the wave fronts do not coincide, and orientation of the source S₂ as to the observer permanently changes. This in no case can be classified as one and the same event. The more, the diagram starts at the instant when observer entered the region of signal propagation from the source S₂ and finishes after he left this region. This also may not be identified as one event. The very fact that the observer once does not see the light, once sees, then again does not automatically establishes some sequence of events. And if there appeared some sequence of events and in each of them the outer configuration of affected objects changes, there automatically appears the physical time in the observer's frame and describes this sequence. Another matter, in which way can we register this sequence, but this already is not the matter of meaning of time, as relativists claim. This is the matter of our methods to measure this time. And these are basically different matters. Here we already may not rely on one basic scheme that cannot give a positive output. If you put someone into a cellar and give him no measuring instruments, he will think the Earth plane, will not he? But this does not mean that because of this person in cellar the Earth has to become plane. It will remain as it was.

And as to infinite power of source in this case, Einstein also was not correct. We see from the diagram that when the observer moved towards the wave front coming from the source S₁, they both will pass equal spatial distances; it means, in full accordance with classical formalism, for observer the frequency will only redouble, and the time of pulse indication by observer will be minimal; hence, the source intensity registered by the observer when his speed approaches the speed of light will fall, not grow.

The same effect we can watch in the region far from relativistic speeds - in old high-speed cinecameras. The less time of object registration the more sensitive film have we to take. With one and the same sensitivity, the higher speed of object the less exposure of film, with the same intensity of the object radiation. With continuous intensity of source we also cannot expect higher brightness with the observer's speed approaching the speed of light. As our studies [5, 6] show, the reaction of mechanical and electrical systems to external affection falls with growing frequency of affecting force. From this, if relativistic frequency of source tends to infinity, as the speed achieves that of light, the observer's receiver will less and less react to this light. In other words, the observer will see black void. But this another prediction of relativistic conception also does not relate to reality. It follows from it that the observer simply will not see the sequence of events and due to it time will disappear for him. As is known, in Relativity the metric reduction occurs only in direction of motion. In perpendicular direction the metric is constant. This means, the above circumstance could cause only that the observer would not see the source S₁. The source S₂ located in direction transverse to the observer will be seen. We see from the diagram that as to the source S₂, the observer's receiver will register the signal periodically appearing and disappearing - this means appearing sequence of events from which the idea of time comes. This nuance also evidences that the scheme on whose basis relativists formed their conception was artificial.