Materials.Technologies.Tools

6

S.B. Karavashkin

(5)

where

Then we assume that Ar can be presented as a product of some constant C into the sine of some angle tetabig14cut.gif (856 bytes)p constant for the given value omegacut.gif (838 bytes)p (where p is the number of allowed mode), i.e., for some allowed circular frequency of possible vibrations

(6)

where C = const; tetabig14cut.gif (856 bytes)p = f (omegacut.gif (838 bytes)p);  f is the vibration frequency in the line.

In its turn, we determine the parameter tetabig14cut.gif (856 bytes)p  from the boundary conditions (3) from which

(7)

Finally, proceeding from the yielded value tetabig14cut.gif (856 bytes)p , we find the resolved circular frequencies omegacut.gif (838 bytes)p , substituting (6) and (7) into (5):

(8)

We can immediately see from this brief analysis that the method of resolved modes can give the exact solutions only in case of free vibrations and only for a fixed-ends-line. If the forced vibrations were present in the line, the modelling system of differential equations cannot be reduced to the system of algebraic equations (4), because at least in one equation of this system there will be present the external force parameters breaking the uniformity of (4). And if at least one of the line ends is unfixed, then, as we will show below, we cannot indicate a priori the vibration amplitude value at the line ends, because in lumped lines, in distinction from the known solutions for those distributed, the vibration maximum will not take place at the free ends. Thus, as we see, the limitations inherent in the allowed modes method are important, so we cannot think the problem of elastic lumped lines to be completely solved by this approach.

The second approach to solve this problem is Krylov method grounded on the matrix theory tool which bases on the energy conservation for the constrained-bodies-system free vibrations that leads to the system of differential equations similar to (1):

(9)

where ajk , cjk are the constant parameters characterising the studied system of bodies; qk is the  kth body location in the generalised coordinates; N is the bodies quantity in the studied system.

Further, assuming that

(10)

where Ak , epsiloncut.gif (833 bytes)  are some constant values characterising the vibrations of a bodies structure, the system of equations (9) transforms to the determinant of a following type:

(11)

In the view of seeking the exact solutions, this method has the following difficulty. The characteristic equation (11) is an algebraic equation of 2N power with respect to omegacut.gif (838 bytes); hence, it has 2N roots, i.e. N eigenvalues omegacut.gif (838 bytes)k(k = 1, 2, ..., N). With it, as is known, we can yield the exact solution of an algebraic equation only up to N = 4 (in our case, the bi-N algebraic equation). Thus, the matrix approach to solve this problem for free vibrations is much limited by a small number of constrained bodies. In case of forced vibrations, Krylov method is based on solving the problem for free vibrations, so the solution is sought by variation of the constant. With it we naturally yield the line spectrum of forced vibrations. At the same time, as we will show below, in finite lines the forced vibrations spectrum has a continued pattern with the infinite resonances at the frequencies corresponding to the natural vibrations of bodies structure. Furthermore, in a finite structure of constrained bodies, the forced vibrations have three regimes that cannot be determined on the basis of natural frequencies.

3. Analysis of exact complete solutions and checking the results yielded for finite lines

Above we pointed the substantial limitations inherent in existing approaches. We can easy overcome them in frames of method presented as the basic in [1], when yielding the complete exact solutions for infinite elastic lumped lines. To show it, consider first the solutions yielded with this method for a finite unfixed-ends line, i.e., namely for the line whose exact solution we cannot yield in general case, when the number of elements is large, neither by the resolved modes method nor by Krylov method.

Contents: / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13

Hosted by uCoz