Supplement 2. The answers to
Sergey Khartikovs questions
After the publication of our paper on black holes and in
parallel with that of Supplement 1, we discussed this subject with Mr Sergey Khartikov and
answered in the Supplement 1 to a part of his questions. He expressed a doubt and asked
new questions, though, as it will be seen, much transformed. Since at all events these
questions concern the basic aspects of our paper and crucial points of understanding the
black hole conception wrong, we decided to write the Supplement 2 as Mr Khartikovs
questions and our answers.
To make this material more visual, we denoted our previous
answers to Mr Krartikov on which he bases in olive colour, his new questions in
bluish-green, citations from literature - in usual for our journal green colour, and the questions will be numbered in red.
1. Citation: As to the reecord of metric
transformation, here you are multiply incorrect.
Sergey, the formula (18) of your work
means the calculation of Jacobian of coordinate transformation in the plane Euclidean
space. In the Schwarzschild problem, the space is initially Riemanns, so your
formula (18) wittingly never will match the Schwarzschilds Jacobian. You derived
your (18) for the equation (16). Calculate the same for the initial equation (14) and you
will see, the results will differ strongly by the multiplier r2 sin being just the Jacobian calculated by
Schwarzschild, i.e. things fully match the coordinate transformation in the Riemann space.
Although Schwarzschild has yielded his Jacobian in the immediate calculation, I was not
lazy to calculate it in your way and it coincided with the Schwarzschilds
result.
I would repeat this result, to avoid any
vagueness: the root of determinant for the metric (14) multiplied by the Jacobian r2 sin coincides with the root of the
determinant for the metric (16). Will you use the 3-D either 4-D variant, you will yield
the same. I have calculated by three techniques - yours, immediate calculation and after
Schwarzschild - they all gave same results. This means, there is no mistake in
Schwarzschilds work.
Let us start from your point as if we determined the
Jacobian in the plane Euclidean space and Schwarzschild in that Riemann.
In transition from the metric in rectilinear coordinates
((14) of our paper) |