SELF

20

S.B. Karavashkin and O.N. Karavashkina

It is convenient to transform (7) into an algebraic form, noting (11):

(14)

Now substituting (5) and (13) into (14), after the transformation we yield the sought solution in the form

(15)

where 

(16)

ficut.gif (844 bytes)r , ficut.gif (844 bytes)0r are the delay phases of the resistant line:

(17)
(18)

and A, B, C, D are auxiliary parameters:

(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)

Comparing (15) with (14), we see that the resistance affects the solution in two ways. It effects on the vibration pattern on the whole and on the link-to-link excitation transmission. The multiplier ( omegacut.gif (838 bytes)4m2 + r2 omegacut.gif (838 bytes)2)1/4 effects on the amplitude as the whole. Its influence is especially considerable at the low and ultralow frequencies, when r2 omegacut.gif (838 bytes)2 is comparable with omegacut.gif (838 bytes)4m2. It is quite limited band, out of which in practical calculations we can neglect r2 omegacut.gif (838 bytes)2 in comparison with omegacut.gif (838 bytes)4m2.

The parameter ficut.gif (844 bytes)0r  also effects on the vibration phase on the whole. According to (18) and taking into account (19) and (20), this influence is also limited by low and ultralow frequencies. At  r << momegacut.gif (838 bytes), the vibration phase ficut.gif (844 bytes)0r can be approximately calculated as

(23)

Despite so limited influence of these parameters, we have to take them into consideration when studying the ultralow-band vibrations and broad-range excitations, since the presence of phase ficut.gif (844 bytes)0r causes the dependence of initial phase of vibration process on the frequency, because of hyperbolic dependence of this phase on frequency in (23).

Contents: / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 /

Hosted by uCoz