SELF |
56 |
S.B. Karavashkin and O.N. Karavashkina |
|
It is the appropriate case to speak a little about black
holes whom the scientists are now actively seeking for. Nothing surprising that they
connect the closed trajectories of motion of stellar systems in galaxies with the idea of
black holes in their centre - this is a simple inertia of mind when analysing the
mechanical models. In reality, as we showed above, such motion of stellar substance along
the closed trajectory does not need the gravitating mass in the centre of system. Stellar
substance as such, due to gravitational interaction between its entities, creates the
conditions for substance compaction, and presence of rotation, jointly with arising
disbalance of mass centre, forms closed trajectories of motion of galactic substance. With
it we naturally can draw the axis of such rotation, but in this axis any body of whatever
significant mass will be absent. Just so the scientists seek in these centres without any
result something which would be able to provide the attraction, and come to a mind that
this is some invisible object. While the possibility of black holes as the centres of
attraction is quite doubtful, because of lack of regularities which would provide the
formation of such significant gravitational masses in so small regions.
Speaking of possibility of black holes formation, we should first of all take into account that when Schwarzschild and his followers calculated the radius of sphere, beginning with which, the massive body begins continuously compress to a point, they neglected a whole number of basic factors. Should they take them into account, they would never yield such solution. In particular, if speaking of Schwarzschild's version of derivation, based on the model of liquid sphere, he stated the following conditions to be fulfilled for this problem: "(1) the density is homogeneous; (2) the pressure on the surface vanishes; (3) the system of stresses corresponds to some isotropic hydrostatic pressure and so satisfies the condition of equilibrium for ideal liquid; (4) the pressure becomes infinite, negative or imaginary nowhere" [13, p. 319]. With such statement of problem, grounding on the Schwarzschild's metric |
(37) |
where |
(38) |
"the further calculation gives the following expression for pressure: |
(39) |
[13, p. 318]. "At the same time the conclusion that the solution corresponds to the case of ideal liquid with homogeneous distribution of density relates only to the density T44 or 00. However , the condition of unchanged 00 for non-compressed liquid seems to be not fulfilled. We need to yield the solution for which T or 0 would remain unchanged in the whole liquid sphere; however, there in Schwarzschild's study is not the solution of this problem. Until the size of sphere was small, this difference does not cause a large divergence; however, for large spheres the pressure in the near of centre is very large, and both solutions can differ much from each other. It is easy to prove that for large spheres, where |
(40) |
Schwarzschild's solution gives at the central point the negative value for T. So, seemingly, even doing not approaching the boundary |
(41) |
the solution already does not have any physical meaning. We should much regret that the solution stops to be real just for large spheres, as the existence of upper limit for spheres is just one of the most interesting points of the whole problem. As far as I know, in yielding the exact solution for liquid sphere there still was not achieved any considerable success which would enlighten the pattern of space radius diminishing with the increase of the spheres size. In any case, I do these marks not without a doubt, as it is difficult to say, how will the real liquid behave in the case when very strongly growing pressure already is not able to bring the particles together more strongly. We have fully clear the issue of nature of gas pressure, as it is determined by the velocity of molecules. On the contrary, in liquid there could arise the Maxwellian electromagnetic tensions, and then the conclusion that 0 is constant would not be true. On the other hand, besides, some mysterious quantum phenomena could appear, of which we cannot judge at all" [13, p. 319- 320]. |
Contents: / 39 / 40 / 41 / 42 / 43 / 44 / 45 / 46 / 47 / 48 / 49 / 50 / 51 / 52 / 53 / 54 / 55 / 56 / 57 / 58 / 59 / 60 / 61 / 62 / 63 / 64 / 65 / 66 / 67 / 68 / 69 / 70 / 71 / 72 / 73 /